Prosthetic Metallic Artifact Reduction

Damita L. Thomas, MD
Data courtesy of New Century Imaging, Oradell, New Jersey, USA
 |  2018-06-18

A 62-year-old woman with a prior history of left hip replacement following a fracture injury in 2004 recently sustained prosthetic migration. In order to better plan for the scope and complexity of the planned procedure, preoperative imaging was acquired in order to evaluate for intrapelvic organ injury and pelvic vasculature damage.

1Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Study: joint replacement to become the most common elective surgical procedure in the next decades. Updated February 2, 2016. Accessed March 14, 2018.

2American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Total hip replacement. Updated August 2015. Accessed March 14, 2018.

3Kremers HM, Larson DR, Crowson CS, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1386-1397.

4Dargel J, Oppermann J, Brüggemann G-P, Eysel P. Dislocation following total hip replacement. Dtsch Arztebl Intl. 2014;111:884-890.

5Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics. 2004;24:1679-1691.

6Huang JY, Followill DS, Howell RM, et al. Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants. Med Phys. 2016;43(9):5117-5130.

The outcomes by Siemens Healthineers customers described herein are based on results that were achieved in the customer’s unique setting. Since there is no “typical” hospital and many variables exist (e.g., hospital size, case mix, level of IT adoption) there can be no guarantee that other customers will achieve the same results.